Price testing, value metric selection, packaging strategy, discount frameworks, and willingness-to-pay research.
The value metric is what you charge for. Get this wrong and everything else fails.
Good value metric criteria:
| Metric type | Examples | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Per seat | $X/user/month | Collaboration tools |
| Per usage | $X/API call, $X/GB | Infrastructure, API products |
| Per feature | Tier-based access | Horizontal SaaS |
| Per outcome | $X/lead, $X/transaction | Performance tools |
| Flat rate | $X/month | Simple products |
Decision framework:
Survey questions (ask all 4):
Analysis: Plot cumulative distributions of all 4 questions. Intersections give:
| Intersection | Meaning |
|---|---|
| "Too cheap" ∩ "Getting expensive" | Point of marginal cheapness |
| "Bargain" ∩ "Too expensive" | Point of marginal expensiveness |
| "Too cheap" ∩ "Too expensive" | Optimal price point |
| "Bargain" ∩ "Getting expensive" | Indifference price point |
Acceptable price range: Between marginal cheapness and marginal expensiveness.
Minimum sample: 200 responses per segment for reliable results.
3-tier standard (recommended starting point):
| Element | Starter | Professional | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price anchor | Low (attract) | Medium (convert) | High (capture) |
| Target | Individual / small team | Growing team | Large organization |
| Value metric limit | Low | Medium | Unlimited or custom |
| Support | Self-serve | Email + chat | Dedicated CSM |
| Features | Core only | Core + advanced | All + custom |
Pricing rules:
Guardrails:
| Discount type | Max | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Annual prepay | 20% | Self-serve |
| Multi-year deal | 30% | Manager approval |
| Competitive switch | 15% | Manager approval |
| Volume (10+ seats) | 15% | Auto-calculated |
| Strategic / Logo | 40% | VP approval + documented justification |
Rules:
Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) adjustments:
| Tier | Countries | Adjustment |
|---|---|---|
| Full price | US, UK, Canada, Australia, Germany, France | 100% |
| Tier 2 | Spain, Italy, Portugal, Czech Republic, Poland | 70-80% |
| Tier 3 | Brazil, Mexico, Turkey, South Africa | 50-60% |
| Tier 4 | India, Indonesia, Philippines, Nigeria | 30-40% |
Implementation:
Best practices:
Communication timeline:
| When | Action |
|---|---|
| 90 days before | Internal alignment: sales, CS, support briefed |
| 60 days before | Email announcement to all customers (clear, empathetic) |
| 30 days before | Reminder email + lock-in offer (annual at current price) |
| Day of | Price change live + support team ready for questions |
| 30 days after | Review churn impact, adjust if needed |
Email template:
Subject: Changes to your [Product] plan
Hi [Name],
On [date], we're updating our pricing. Your plan will change
from $X/mo to $Y/mo.
Why: [Honest reason — new features, increased costs, market alignment].
What you can do:
- Lock in current pricing by switching to annual before [date]
- Upgrade to [plan] to get [specific new value] at the new rate
- Questions? Reply to this email — we're here to help.
[Name], [Title]
Expected impact: Well-communicated 10-20% increase typically sees < 2% incremental churn. Poorly communicated or >30% increase can see 5-10%+ churn.